From: no-reply@sashiko.virtuozzo.com
To: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>,
Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>,
vasileios.almpanis@virtuozzo.com
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 4/6] ve/printk: Fix time virtualization
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 22:04:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010701a1133ed4d3-9850f1f4-78ad-40eb-835b-ba115547aecc-000000@eu-central-1.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006-ve-printk-irq-v2-4-db1dc4f6ed07@virtuozzo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] printk: time_ns refcount get/put in any-context vprintk_store_log() path
- [Low] printk: boottime shift baked in at store time leaves early records unshifted
- [Low] printk: init_log_state references ve0 without a CONFIG_VE guard
--
commit 5c30ca9d767fcbace4f34b24a8dcf1364e21ebb6
Author: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
ve/printk: Fix time virtualization
This patch moves the container boottime shift from print time (where
get_exec_env() was used) to message store time in vprintk_store_log().
The shift now uses the owning VE of the log_state, so IRQ printks no
longer pick up the wrong container's offsets.
Link: https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-146839
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/internal.h b/kernel/printk/internal.h
> --- a/kernel/printk/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/printk/internal.h
[ ... ]
> +#define GET_VE_LOG(ve) ((struct log_state *) ve->log_state)
> +
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but GET_VE_LOG() is not used anywhere in kernel/printk,
and it does not parenthesize its argument, so GET_VE_LOG(a + b) would
expand to a + b->log_state. Is the macro needed in this patch?
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ struct log_state init_log_state = {
> .val[1] = 0,
> },
> .prb = &printk_rb_static,
> + .owner_ve = &ve0,
> };
[Severity: Low]
Will this build when CONFIG_PRINTK=y and CONFIG_VE=n? The declaration
extern struct ve_struct ve0; in include/linux/ve_proto.h is inside
#ifdef CONFIG_VE, and the !CONFIG_VE branch only provides the get_ve0()
stub.
Other VE-specific code in this file is guarded by #ifdef CONFIG_VE, so
should the .owner_ve initializer be guarded in the same way?
[ ... ]
> -static inline u64 ve_timens_add_boottime_ns(u64 nsec)
> +static inline u64 ve_timens_add_boottime_ns(u64 nsec, struct ve_struct *ve)
> {
> struct time_namespace *ve_time_ns;
> struct timens_offsets *ns_offsets;
>
> - ve_time_ns = ve_get_time_ns(get_exec_env());
> + ve_time_ns = ve_get_time_ns(ve);
> if (unlikely(!ve_time_ns)) {
> /* container not yet started */
> return nsec;
[ ... ]
> @@ -2329,6 +2325,7 @@ static int vprintk_store_log(struct log_state *log, int facility, int level,
> * timestamp with respect to the caller.
> */
> ts_nsec = local_clock();
> + ts_nsec = ve_timens_add_boottime_ns(ts_nsec, log->owner_ve);
[Severity: Medium]
Can this take and drop a time_ns reference from a context where the final
put is unsafe?
vprintk_store_log() runs in the any-context store path, after
printk_enter_irqsave(). It now calls:
vprintk_store_log()
ve_timens_add_boottime_ns()
ve_get_time_ns() /* get_time_ns() under rcu_read_lock() */
put_time_ns()
ve_get_time_ns() holds the reference past the RCU section. Consider the
teardown side in ve_drop_context():
rcu_assign_pointer(ve->ve_nsproxy, NULL);
synchronize_rcu();
put_nsproxy(ve_nsproxy);
If a printk took its reference before the pointer was cleared, can it end
up holding the last time_ns reference? In that case put_time_ns() would
call free_time_ns() from inside the printk store path, which may be in
hardirq or other atomic context.
Separately, this adds an RCU lock plus an atomic inc/dec on every printk
record, including host (ve0) records, where it touches init_time_ns.
Would it be possible to read the offsets under RCU without taking a
reference, cache the boottime offset in log_state, or skip ve0?
[Severity: Low]
Is it intended that records stored while ve->ve_nsproxy is NULL keep the
raw host uptime permanently?
ve_log_init() runs at css_alloc, but ve_nsproxy is only set later by
ve_grab_context(). Until then ve_get_time_ns() returns NULL and
ve_timens_add_boottime_ns() returns the value unshifted:
if (unlikely(!ve_time_ns)) {
/* container not yet started */
return nsec;
}
Before this patch the shift was applied at read time, so every record
was shifted consistently once the container had started. Now the
container's dmesg can show a mixed timeline, and the raw ts_nsec in the
VE ring buffer differs from what was read before. The commit message does
not mention this change in behavior.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.vzint.dev/#/patchset/20261006-ve-printk-irq-v2-0-db1dc4f6ed07@virtuozzo.com?part=4
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 21:53 [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 0/6] ve/printk: Fix logs leakage via ve_printk called from IRQ context Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 21:53 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 1/6] ve/printk: Add sanity checks in ve_printk functions Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 21:58 ` no-reply
2026-10-11 20:58 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 21:53 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 2/6] ve/printk: Report potentially leaking usage of " Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 21:59 ` no-reply
2026-10-11 21:18 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 21:53 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 3/6] ve/printk: Specify ve in printks Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 22:03 ` no-reply
2026-10-11 21:35 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 21:53 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 4/6] ve/printk: Fix time virtualization Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 22:04 ` no-reply [this message]
2026-10-11 22:38 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 21:53 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 5/6] ve/failcount: Use ve_printk with specified ve Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 22:04 ` no-reply
2026-10-06 21:53 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 6/6] ve: add neigh_tbl failcounter Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-06 22:06 ` no-reply
2026-10-11 22:45 ` Vladimir Riabchun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=010701a1133ed4d3-9850f1f4-78ad-40eb-835b-ba115547aecc-000000@eu-central-1.amazonses.com \
--to=no-reply@sashiko.virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=vasileios.almpanis@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.