From: no-reply@sashiko.virtuozzo.com
To: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>, khorenko@virtuozzo.com
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] selftests: net: veth: check UDP GRO forwarding on forwarded traffic
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:13:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010701a17820dd12-30cc3673-9d26-4088-b196-3da330d2d5d9-000000@eu-central-1.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026120854.600354-2-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
> The rx-udp-gro-forwarding checks fail with "got 10 packets, expected 1"
> on a host where something has a UDP tunnel socket, a vxlan say, and
> pass on a host where nothing does. Since commit 36707061d6ba ("udp:
> allow forwarding of plain (non-fraglisted) UDP GRO packets") the
> feature aggregates only datagrams GRO finds no socket for, and GRO
> looks the socket up only once a tunnel socket exists on the host; the
> checks send to a socket in the receiving namespace, so they pass only
> while nothing looks it up.
> This tree made them pass by changing the kernel instead, in commit
> 8ce3afeec4ca ("udp: let rx-udp-gro-forwarding aggregate under
> encapsulation"), which upstream did not take.
>
> Let the destination forward the datagrams to a receiver in a namespace
> behind it: no local socket is found there, tunnel or not, and the
> checks count what the destination receives as before.
>
> Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAF=yD-LZSec9g_0bBgrcQvq2OO1BrxMSRHH=uU7eamCmWcTO_A@mail.gmail.com/
> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-151678
> Feature: fix selftests
> Signed-off-by: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.vzint.dev/#/patchset/20261026120854.600354-1-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com?part=1
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 12:06 [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 0/2] selftests: net: veth: run under separate netns Eva Kurchatova
2026-10-26 12:06 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] selftests: net: veth: check UDP GRO forwarding on forwarded traffic Eva Kurchatova
2026-10-26 12:13 ` no-reply [this message]
2026-10-27 17:24 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-10-26 12:06 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 2/2] Revert "udp: let rx-udp-gro-forwarding aggregate under encapsulation" Eva Kurchatova
2026-10-26 12:11 ` no-reply
2026-10-27 17:25 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-10-27 17:24 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 0/2] selftests: net: veth: run under separate netns Konstantin Khorenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=010701a17820dd12-30cc3673-9d26-4088-b196-3da330d2d5d9-000000@eu-central-1.amazonses.com \
--to=no-reply@sashiko.virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.