From: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
To: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>,
Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] sched: Fix sched_getaffinity syscall
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:30:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3575d723-15f8-4cff-a4c6-431cf675b555@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6a35357-2500-450e-966e-aaacd61a255e@virtuozzo.com>
On 10/28/26 10:34, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/26 21:51, Vladimir Riabchun wrote:
>> We observed incorrect cpu numbers inside containers:
>> [root@localhost ~]# nproc
>> 64
>>
>> even when there were much less physical/virtual CPUs.
>>
>> The root cause is incorrect bitmap_fill usage - it sets whole
>> integers only, without handling bit tails, so the actual number of
>> set bits is 64 = bits in ULONG.
>
> Agreed, this is the real bug.
>
>> Anyway, this approach is incorrect - it doesn't respect
>> container cpuset.
>
> Why vcpu should respect cpuset? Those are different things. cpu.nr_cpus
> (num_online_vcpus()) is the number of virtual cpus the container sees, it
> limits cpu time and is not bound to any physical cpu. Cpuset is a binding to
> physical cpu ids. The old code returned the virtual view [0, nr_vcpus), the
> same as we show in /sys/devices/system/cpu/{online,possible,present}
> (show_cpus_attr()) and in /proc/cpuinfo.
As discussed, I'll change the logic so we return
[0; min(vr_vcpus, count(mask))) bits.
We can't use setaffinity from inside CT, so these bits
can be used only for counting, and min(vr_vcpus, count(mask))
is the closest to the actual resources CT has.
>
>>
>> Fix sched_getaffinity syscall by reusing p->cpus_mask, and bounding it
>> with num_online_vcpus().
>>
>> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-141682
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 13 +++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
>> index 6d921043e9e7..92051bace212 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
>> @@ -1305,6 +1305,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setaffinity, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, len,
>> long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask)
>> {
>> struct task_struct *p;
>> + unsigned int online_vcpus = num_online_vcpus();
>> int retval;
>>
>> guard(rcu)();
>> @@ -1316,14 +1317,14 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask)
>> if (retval)
>> return retval;
>>
>> - if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env())) {
>> - cpumask_clear(mask);
>> - bitmap_fill(cpumask_bits(mask), num_online_vcpus());
>> - return 0;
>> + scoped_guard (raw_spinlock_irqsave, &p->pi_lock) {
>> + cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>> }
>>
>> - guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&p->pi_lock);
>> - cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>> + if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env()) &&
>> + !WARN_ON_ONCE(online_vcpus > nr_cpumask_bits))
>> + bitmap_clear(cpumask_bits(mask), online_vcpus,
>> + nr_cpumask_bits - online_vcpus);
>
> This intersects a physical cpu mask with a virtual cpu range and if intersection
> is empty I think it will look inconsistent.
>
> One option is just to fix the bitmap_fill() part and keep the virtual view:
>
> if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env())) {
> cpumask_clear(mask);
> bitmap_set(cpumask_bits(mask), 0, num_online_vcpus());
> return 0;
> }
>
> Or if we want cpuset represented to follow mainstream more we should intersect those
> smartly with mapping, e.g.:
>
> if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env())) {
> unsigned int nr = num_online_vcpus(), cpu;
> cpumask_var_t phys; /* or a local loop over a copy */
> ...
> cpumask_and(phys, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> cpumask_clear(mask);
> for_each_cpu(cpu, phys)
> __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu % nr, mask);
> }
>
> same mapping as in task_vcpu_id.
>
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
--
Best regards, Riabchun Vladimir
Linux Kernel Developer, Virtuozzo
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 20:51 [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 0/2] sched: Fix incorrect nproc report inside CT Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-27 20:51 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] sched: Fix sched_getaffinity syscall Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-28 9:34 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2026-10-28 10:30 ` Vladimir Riabchun [this message]
2026-10-27 20:51 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 2/2] selftests: ve: Test sched_getaffinity in VE Vladimir Riabchun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3575d723-15f8-4cff-a4c6-431cf675b555@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.