From: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@virtuozzo.com>
To: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: devel@openvz.org, Liu Kui <kui.liu@virtuozzo.com>,
azaitsev@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1] fs/fuse kio: start connect once per rpc_queue_work batch
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 18:46:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMrnHh44M4nHv-hAc-pGpWp+hRL62HoWPcgPoxeE6L5hTeXBWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d1074e7-a34d-4137-8c77-09927042606a@virtuozzo.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 5:41 PM Vladimir Riabchun
<vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> I now think it won't work: we take messages from ep->input_queue,
> move them to ep->state_queue via pcs_rpc_send, but also while doing
> this we set msg->rpc = ep. When we reach second pcs_rpc_send with
> this message, it will trigger BUG_ON(msg->rpc != (requeue ? ep: NULL)).
Please, elaborate.
Yes, the code is kind of strange, I daresay. Apparently, original author did
some wrong assumptions and left mud, and when we cleaned it up later, instead of
just cleanup we left old paths, added BUG_ONs and abundant comments,
apparently being afraid that we miss something. :-) Must just be
deleted altogether.
Yet the intent is clear. msg->rpc is NULL while message is in
input_queue. It grabs ref
and assigns it the first time it leaves this queue. And after this
it stays == ep. It does not even correlate with the patch.
> So you think we should keep the RK patch simple and not bother with
> already stuck nodes
This is yes.
>... and force options?
And this is up to you. IMHO the whole digging of stack in livepatch is
entirely useless,
protects from nothing. At least I do not understand this wisdom and
leave paranoia to persons
who do understand.
As I see the only real danger is when after patch old code which is
still running (old rpc_queue_work())
calls pcs_rpc_send, which after the patch is _new_. This means that
rpc connect can
be missed because it is removed from pcs_rpc_send, and old rpc_queue_work does
not have it. Well, it is not a big deal, it will timeout and redone later.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 11:28 Liu Kui
2026-09-21 12:13 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-21 20:52 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-21 21:17 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-22 9:38 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-22 10:46 ` Alexey Kuznetsov [this message]
2026-09-22 11:36 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-22 13:12 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-22 14:10 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-22 15:01 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-22 15:19 ` Vladimir Riabchun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMrnHh44M4nHv-hAc-pGpWp+hRL62HoWPcgPoxeE6L5hTeXBWg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kuznet@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=azaitsev@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=kui.liu@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.