OpenVZ / Virtuozzo kernel development (devel@openvz.org)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
To: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH vz10 4/7] selftests: net: make the veth GRO checks independent of host tunnels
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 14:51:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179000230736.645403.14575711999525636303.b4-review@b4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831224850.1642265-4-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>

On Tue, 01 Sep 2026 01:48:22 +0300, Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> Three aggregation checks report 10 packets where they want 1 on a host
> that has a vxlan, and pass on a host that does not. The kernel is doing
> what it is written to do.
> 
> udp4_gro_receive() looks up the receiving socket only when
> udp_encap_needed_key is on, and that key is global: any UDP
> encapsulation socket on the machine, in any namespace, turns it on.
> udp_gro_receive() then aggregates for a packet that has no socket, or
> for a socket that asked for UDP GRO, and consults NETIF_F_GRO_UDP_FWD
> only in the first case. So with a vxlan somewhere on the box the lookup
> finds the test's own receiver, and rx-udp-gro-forwarding never gets a
> say.
> 
> [...]

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>

-- 
Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31 22:48 [Devel] [PATCH vz10 1/7] ms/vxlan: do not reuse cached ip_hdr() value after skb_tunnel_check_pmtu() Eva Kurchatova
2026-08-31 22:48 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 2/7] selftests: net: run the fdb and bind tests in their own netns Eva Kurchatova
2026-09-21 14:51   ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-08-31 22:48 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 3/7] selftests: net: skip what this kernel and iproute2 do not have Eva Kurchatova
2026-09-21 14:51   ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-08-31 22:48 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 4/7] selftests: net: make the veth GRO checks independent of host tunnels Eva Kurchatova
2026-09-21 14:51   ` Vladimir Riabchun [this message]
2026-08-31 22:48 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 5/7] selftests: net: install pmtu.sh, the script pmtu_wrapper.sh runs Eva Kurchatova
2026-09-21 14:51   ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-08-31 22:48 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 6/7] selftests: net: mark test_ingress_egress_chaining.sh executable Eva Kurchatova
2026-09-21 14:51   ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-08-31 22:48 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 7/7] selftests: net: let the bridged PMTU tests take the ICMP they ask for Eva Kurchatova
2026-09-21 14:51   ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-18 10:50 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 1/7] ms/vxlan: do not reuse cached ip_hdr() value after skb_tunnel_check_pmtu() Vasileios Almpanis
2026-09-21 14:51 ` Vladimir Riabchun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179000230736.645403.14575711999525636303.b4-review@b4 \
    --to=vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox