From: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
To: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 5/6] drivers/md/push_backup: arm deadline timer under pb->lock
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 11:11:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179370066312.2382033.8474782518776715664.b4-review@b4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103080358.723186-6-andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com>
On 11/3/26 11:03, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
> When push_backup_write acks last delayed request it sets
> deadline_jiffies = S64_MAX and the next fired timer uses this
> for mod_timer(): expiry is set to some very distant future.
>
> Previously a later push_backup_write() would accidentally
> repair the expiry; since it no longer touches the timer, nothing
> does until stop.
Hi Andrey,
When the callback parks the timer this way, nothing is delayed, and the
next delayed write takes the nr_delayed == 1 branch in
postpone_if_required_for_backup(), which arms the timer itself. So this
case is harmless and "nothing does until stop" does not hold. The real
bug is the race item 5 of your cover letter describes: the callback
reads S64_MAX under the lock, postpone arms a fresh deadline, and the
late mod_timer() of the callback overwrites it while writes are
delayed. Could these two paragraphs describe that instead?
> A callback blocked on pb->lock could thus outlive stop and re-arm the
> timer or queue do_pb_work() after flush_workqueue(), expiring a later
> session.
A small precision: synchronize_rcu() already waited for a callback that
was running, or spinning on pb->lock, when it started, because the
timer softirq is an RCU reader. What escaped is a firing that starts
after the grace period.
> @@ -241,23 +241,24 @@ static void pb_timer_func(struct timer_list *timer)
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&pb->lock, flags);
> deadline = pb->deadline_jiffies;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pb->lock, flags);
> -
> + if (!pb->alive || deadline == S64_MAX)
> + goto unlock;
pb->alive is not cleared by cleanup_backup() only. pb_message() clears
it for "push_backup_stop" before it takes ctl_rwsem, on purpose since
6cd7e75f682f ("dm/push_backup: Allow to stop push_backup at any
time"):
spin_lock_irq(&pb->lock);
pb->alive = false;
spin_unlock_irq(&pb->lock);
...
ret = down_write_killable(&pb->ctl_rwsem);
...
if (unlikely(ret))
goto out;
If the stopping tool gets a fatal signal while the rwsem is held by
another message, push_backup_stop() never runs. alive is false,
nr_delayed is non-zero and the deadline is real. Before this patch the
timer still expired it and do_pb_work() released the guest writes.
With this hunk the callback returns and does not re-arm, read() and
write() on the fd return -ESTALE, and the writes hang until somebody
sends "push_backup_stop" again. dm suspend, "@stats_create" and remove
wait for them meanwhile.
Checking nr_delayed instead keeps what the patch relies on:
if (!pb->nr_delayed)
goto unlock;
cleanup_backup() zeroes nr_delayed under the same lock hold that clears
alive, and postpone only delays while alive. So after stop the callback
still neither re-arms nor queues work, and in the state above it expires
the deadline as before. While alive, deadline == S64_MAX is the same as
nr_delayed == 0.
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(timer_delete_sync_try(&pb->deadline_timer) < 0);
> + timer_shutdown_sync(&pb->deadline_timer);
This also fixes a use-after-free: removing the target while the
callback ran made pb_destroy() WARN and go on to destroy_workqueue()
and kfree(pb) under it. Both that and the stop race came with the
driver, so please add:
Fixes: 62e07487348e ("dm: Add push backup driver")
--
Konstantin Khorenko,
Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 8:03 [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 0/6] dm/push_backup: event fd interface and fixes Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 8:03 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 1/6] drivers/md/push_backup: correct initialization Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 8:11 ` no-reply
2026-11-03 10:11 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-11-03 8:03 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 2/6] drivers/md/push_backup: clear pb->alive under pb->lock Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 8:11 ` no-reply
2026-11-03 10:11 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-11-03 8:03 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 3/6] drivers/md/push_backup: do not re-arm deadline timer in push_backup_write() Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 8:13 ` no-reply
2026-11-03 10:11 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-11-03 8:03 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 4/6] drivers/md/push_backup: fix mod_timer() usage Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 8:12 ` no-reply
2026-11-03 10:11 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-11-03 8:03 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 5/6] drivers/md/push_backup: arm deadline timer under pb->lock Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 8:14 ` no-reply
2026-11-03 10:11 ` Konstantin Khorenko [this message]
2026-11-03 8:03 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 6/6] drivers/md/push_backup: add event file descriptor interface Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 8:17 ` no-reply
2026-11-03 10:11 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-11-03 12:38 ` Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-03 10:11 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v4 0/6] dm/push_backup: event fd interface and fixes Konstantin Khorenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179370066312.2382033.8474782518776715664.b4-review@b4 \
--to=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox