From: Vasileios Almpanis <vasileios.almpanis@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: [Devel] [PATCH VZ10 v2 3/4] connector: deliver per-VE proc events under an RCU read lock
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:10:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818-connectors-v2-3-88c5d9049e6f@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818-connectors-v2-0-88c5d9049e6f@virtuozzo.com>
proc_event_connector_ve() dereferences ve->cn several times and
fill_exit_event() dereferences ve->ve_nsproxy assuming the VE cannot
stop in the middle of the delivery. This holds while the reported task
is alive in the VE: a live task keeps the VE pid namespace busy, so
zap_pid_ns_processes() -> ve_exit_ns() cannot start.
The next patch makes proc_exit_connector() deliver the exit event with
a VE reference pinned before exit_notify(). Once the task is reaped,
its pid no longer keeps the pid namespace busy: the container init may
be woken up by free_pid() from release_task(), finish
zap_pid_ns_processes() and run ve_exit_ns() while the exit event is
still being delivered:
cpu0: exiting task cpu1: container init
do_exit()
exit_notify()
release_task()
free_pid() -------------> wakes zap_pid_ns_processes()
proc_exit_connector() ve_exit_ns()
proc_event_connector_ve() cn_fini_ve() /* ve->cn */
fill_exit_event() ve_drop_context() /* ve_nsproxy */
ve->ve_nsproxy->...
Deliver the event under rcu_read_lock() and recheck the pointers: the
previous patch guarantees everything reachable from ve->cn stays alive
for the whole read-side critical section once observed, and
ve_drop_context() already waits for a grace period before dropping
ve_nsproxy. Bail out if the VE is being stopped: its listeners are
dead anyway, there is nobody to deliver to.
The whole delivery path runs with GFP_NOWAIT and never sleeps, so it
is legal inside an RCU read-side critical section.
https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-140421
Signed-off-by: Vasileios Almpanis <vasileios.almpanis@virtuozzo.com>
Feature: ve: ve generic structures
---
drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/connector/connector.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
index 6095c7def7ce..608430808548 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
@@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ static inline void send_msg_ve(struct ve_struct *ve, struct cn_msg *msg)
struct local_event *le_ptr;
__u32 filter_data[2];
+ /* The VE is being stopped, so are its listeners: nothing to do */
+ if (!cn)
+ return;
+
/*
* The following hack with local_event->lock address works only
* till the "lock" is the first field in the local_event struct,
@@ -172,15 +176,27 @@ static void proc_event_connector_ve(struct task_struct *task,
struct cn_msg *msg;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
+ /*
+ * The exit event may be delivered when the reported task no
+ * longer pins the VE (see proc_exit_connector()), so the VE may
+ * be stopping concurrently. cn_proc_fini_ve() waits for an RCU
+ * grace period before the connector state is freed, take the RCU
+ * read lock to make the state observed here stay valid for the
+ * whole delivery. The path below never sleeps (GFP_NOWAIT).
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
if (proc_event_num_listeners(ve) < 1)
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;
msg = cn_msg_fill(buffer, ve, task, what, cookie, fill_event);
if (!msg)
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;
/* If cn_netlink_send() failed, the data is not sent */
send_msg_ve(ve, msg);
+out_unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
static void proc_event_connector(struct task_struct *task,
@@ -350,9 +366,23 @@ void proc_coredump_connector(struct task_struct *task)
static bool fill_exit_event(struct proc_event *ev, struct ve_struct *ve,
struct task_struct *task, long cookie_pids)
{
- struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = ve->ve_nsproxy->pid_ns_for_children;
+ struct pid_namespace *pid_ns;
struct task_struct *parent;
struct pids *pids = (struct pids *)cookie_pids;
+ struct nsproxy *nsproxy;
+
+ /*
+ * Unlike all other events, the exit event may be delivered after
+ * the task was reaped, when nothing keeps the VE pid namespace
+ * busy anymore and the VE may be stopping concurrently.
+ * ve_drop_context() clears ve_nsproxy and waits for an RCU grace
+ * period before dropping it; we are called under rcu_read_lock().
+ * The VE is dead, so are its listeners: skip the event.
+ */
+ nsproxy = rcu_dereference(ve->ve_nsproxy);
+ if (!nsproxy)
+ return false;
+ pid_ns = nsproxy->pid_ns_for_children;
ev->event_data.exit.process_pid = pid_nr_ns(pids->pid, pid_ns);
ev->event_data.exit.process_tgid = pid_nr_ns(pids->tgid, pid_ns);
diff --git a/drivers/connector/connector.c b/drivers/connector/connector.c
index 6483e15b888e..23c66d80b6b9 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/connector.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/connector.c
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ int cn_netlink_send_mult_ve(struct ve_struct *ve, struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len,
u32 group = 0;
int found = 0;
+ /* The VE is being stopped, see proc_event_connector_ve() */
+ if (!dev)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
if (portid || __group) {
group = __group;
} else {
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 15:10 [Devel] [PATCH VZ10 v2 0/4] connector: do not lose exit events for in-CT listeners Vasileios Almpanis
2026-08-18 15:10 ` [Devel] [PATCH VZ10 v2 1/4] connector: annotate ve->cn with __rcu Vasileios Almpanis
2026-08-25 11:58 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-08-18 15:10 ` [Devel] [PATCH VZ10 v2 2/4] connector: free the per-VE connector state after an RCU grace period Vasileios Almpanis
2026-08-25 11:47 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-08-25 12:43 ` Vasileios Almpanis
2026-08-18 15:10 ` Vasileios Almpanis [this message]
2026-08-18 15:10 ` [Devel] [PATCH VZ10 v2 4/4] proc connector: pin task VE for the exit event notification Vasileios Almpanis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818-connectors-v2-3-88c5d9049e6f@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vasileios.almpanis@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox