From: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
To: khorenko@virtuozzo.com
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] selftests: net: veth: check UDP GRO forwarding on forwarded traffic
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 14:06:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261026120854.600354-2-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026120854.600354-1-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
The rx-udp-gro-forwarding checks fail with "got 10 packets, expected 1"
on a host where something has a UDP tunnel socket, a vxlan say, and
pass on a host where nothing does. Since commit 36707061d6ba ("udp:
allow forwarding of plain (non-fraglisted) UDP GRO packets") the
feature aggregates only datagrams GRO finds no socket for, and GRO
looks the socket up only once a tunnel socket exists on the host; the
checks send to a socket in the receiving namespace, so they pass only
while nothing looks it up.
This tree made them pass by changing the kernel instead, in commit
8ce3afeec4ca ("udp: let rx-udp-gro-forwarding aggregate under
encapsulation"), which upstream did not take.
Let the destination forward the datagrams to a receiver in a namespace
behind it: no local socket is found there, tunnel or not, and the
checks count what the destination receives as before.
Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAF=yD-LZSec9g_0bBgrcQvq2OO1BrxMSRHH=uU7eamCmWcTO_A@mail.gmail.com/
https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-151678
Feature: fix selftests
Signed-off-by: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/veth.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/veth.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/veth.sh
index 6bb7dfaa30b6..42b472e1425f 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/veth.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/veth.sh
@@ -9,10 +9,15 @@ readonly DST=1
readonly DST_NAT=100
readonly NS_SRC=$BASE$SRC
readonly NS_DST=$BASE$DST
+# The receiver of the GRO checks, behind the destination
+readonly RCV=3
+readonly NS_RCV=$BASE$RCV
# "baremetal" network used for raw UDP traffic
readonly BM_NET_V4=192.168.1.
readonly BM_NET_V6=2001:db8::
+# Network between the destination and the receiver
+readonly RCV_NET_V4=192.168.2.
readonly CPUS=`nproc`
ret=0
@@ -24,7 +29,7 @@ cleanup() {
[ -n "${jobs}" ] && kill -1 ${jobs} 2>/dev/null
rm -f $STATS
- for ns in $NS_SRC $NS_DST; do
+ for ns in $NS_SRC $NS_DST $NS_RCV; do
ip netns del $ns 2>/dev/null
done
}
@@ -46,6 +51,17 @@ create_ns() {
ip -n $BASE$ns addr add dev veth$ns $BM_NET_V4$ns/24
ip -n $BASE$ns addr add dev veth$ns $BM_NET_V6$ns/64 nodad
done
+
+ # Forwarded, the datagrams find no local socket, whatever tunnel the host has
+ ip netns add $NS_RCV
+ ip -n $NS_RCV link set dev lo up
+ ip link add name fwd$DST type veth peer name fwd$RCV
+ ip link set dev fwd$DST netns $NS_DST up
+ ip link set dev fwd$RCV netns $NS_RCV up
+ ip -n $NS_DST addr add dev fwd$DST $RCV_NET_V4$DST/24
+ ip -n $NS_RCV addr add dev fwd$RCV $RCV_NET_V4$RCV/24
+ ip netns exec $NS_DST sysctl -wq net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
+ ip -n $NS_RCV route add default via $RCV_NET_V4$DST
}
__chk_flag() {
@@ -101,15 +117,17 @@ chk_gro() {
local msg="$1"
local expected=$2
- ip netns exec $BASE$SRC ping -qc 1 $BM_NET_V4$DST >/dev/null
+ # Taking veth$SRC down drops the route, so set it for every check
+ ip -n $NS_SRC route replace ${RCV_NET_V4}0/24 via $BM_NET_V4$DST
+ ip netns exec $BASE$SRC ping -qc 1 $RCV_NET_V4$RCV >/dev/null
NSTAT_HISTORY=$STATS ip netns exec $NS_DST nstat -n
printf "%-60s" "$msg"
- ip netns exec $BASE$DST ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 &
+ ip netns exec $NS_RCV ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 &
local spid=$!
sleep 0.1
- ip netns exec $NS_SRC ./udpgso_bench_tx -4 -s 13000 -S 1300 -M 1 -D $BM_NET_V4$DST
+ ip netns exec $NS_SRC ./udpgso_bench_tx -4 -s 13000 -S 1300 -M 1 -D $RCV_NET_V4$RCV
local retc=$?
wait $spid
local rets=$?
--
2.56.0
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 12:06 [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 0/2] selftests: net: veth: run under separate netns Eva Kurchatova
2026-10-26 12:06 ` Eva Kurchatova [this message]
2026-10-26 12:13 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] selftests: net: veth: check UDP GRO forwarding on forwarded traffic no-reply
2026-10-27 17:24 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-10-26 12:06 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 2/2] Revert "udp: let rx-udp-gro-forwarding aggregate under encapsulation" Eva Kurchatova
2026-10-26 12:11 ` no-reply
2026-10-27 17:25 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-10-27 17:24 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 0/2] selftests: net: veth: run under separate netns Konstantin Khorenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261026120854.600354-2-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com \
--to=eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox