From: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
To: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>,
Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] sched: Fix sched_getaffinity syscall
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:30:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3575d723-15f8-4cff-a4c6-431cf675b555@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6a35357-2500-450e-966e-aaacd61a255e@virtuozzo.com>
On 10/28/26 10:34, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/26 21:51, Vladimir Riabchun wrote:
>> We observed incorrect cpu numbers inside containers:
>> [root@localhost ~]# nproc
>> 64
>>
>> even when there were much less physical/virtual CPUs.
>>
>> The root cause is incorrect bitmap_fill usage - it sets whole
>> integers only, without handling bit tails, so the actual number of
>> set bits is 64 = bits in ULONG.
>
> Agreed, this is the real bug.
>
>> Anyway, this approach is incorrect - it doesn't respect
>> container cpuset.
>
> Why vcpu should respect cpuset? Those are different things. cpu.nr_cpus
> (num_online_vcpus()) is the number of virtual cpus the container sees, it
> limits cpu time and is not bound to any physical cpu. Cpuset is a binding to
> physical cpu ids. The old code returned the virtual view [0, nr_vcpus), the
> same as we show in /sys/devices/system/cpu/{online,possible,present}
> (show_cpus_attr()) and in /proc/cpuinfo.
As discussed, I'll change the logic so we return
[0; min(vr_vcpus, count(mask))) bits.
We can't use setaffinity from inside CT, so these bits
can be used only for counting, and min(vr_vcpus, count(mask))
is the closest to the actual resources CT has.
>
>>
>> Fix sched_getaffinity syscall by reusing p->cpus_mask, and bounding it
>> with num_online_vcpus().
>>
>> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-141682
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/syscalls.c | 13 +++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
>> index 6d921043e9e7..92051bace212 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
>> @@ -1305,6 +1305,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setaffinity, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, len,
>> long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask)
>> {
>> struct task_struct *p;
>> + unsigned int online_vcpus = num_online_vcpus();
>> int retval;
>>
>> guard(rcu)();
>> @@ -1316,14 +1317,14 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask)
>> if (retval)
>> return retval;
>>
>> - if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env())) {
>> - cpumask_clear(mask);
>> - bitmap_fill(cpumask_bits(mask), num_online_vcpus());
>> - return 0;
>> + scoped_guard (raw_spinlock_irqsave, &p->pi_lock) {
>> + cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>> }
>>
>> - guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&p->pi_lock);
>> - cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>> + if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env()) &&
>> + !WARN_ON_ONCE(online_vcpus > nr_cpumask_bits))
>> + bitmap_clear(cpumask_bits(mask), online_vcpus,
>> + nr_cpumask_bits - online_vcpus);
>
> This intersects a physical cpu mask with a virtual cpu range and if intersection
> is empty I think it will look inconsistent.
>
> One option is just to fix the bitmap_fill() part and keep the virtual view:
>
> if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env())) {
> cpumask_clear(mask);
> bitmap_set(cpumask_bits(mask), 0, num_online_vcpus());
> return 0;
> }
>
> Or if we want cpuset represented to follow mainstream more we should intersect those
> smartly with mapping, e.g.:
>
> if (!ve_is_super(get_exec_env())) {
> unsigned int nr = num_online_vcpus(), cpu;
> cpumask_var_t phys; /* or a local loop over a copy */
> ...
> cpumask_and(phys, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> cpumask_clear(mask);
> for_each_cpu(cpu, phys)
> __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu % nr, mask);
> }
>
> same mapping as in task_vcpu_id.
>
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
--
Best regards, Riabchun Vladimir
Linux Kernel Developer, Virtuozzo
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 20:51 [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 0/2] sched: Fix incorrect nproc report inside CT Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-27 20:51 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 1/2] sched: Fix sched_getaffinity syscall Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-28 9:34 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2026-10-28 10:30 ` Vladimir Riabchun [this message]
2026-10-27 20:51 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 2/2] selftests: ve: Test sched_getaffinity in VE Vladimir Riabchun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3575d723-15f8-4cff-a4c6-431cf675b555@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox