From: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
To: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 2/4] ve: Introduce override_ve/revert_ve helpers
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 18:29:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f772e29-fae7-4cbc-bc0b-e339cd65050e@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179318868950.3559520.1087763096256737038.b4-review@b4>
On 10/28/26 12:58, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote:
>> These helpers mirror override_creds/revert_creds and are supposed to
>> be used together in cases when VE creds may be stored and later used
>> by the different VE task.
>
> In multiple places like /proc/<pid>/status task will jump to other VE.
>
> Also anything using get_task_ve will be tricked to believe in task VE
> change. E.g.:
>
> Small information leak, drivers/connector/cn_proc.c:209.
> proc_event_connector() sends events about a task to that task's VE's
> listeners.
>
Agree. I'll instead introduce a separate field in task struct,
which will contain ve override, and will be used by ve_capable only.
>>
>> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-142405
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ve.h b/include/linux/ve.h
>> index 717567775f58e..9d633717a7fe2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ve.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ve.h
>> @@ -295,6 +295,23 @@ static inline struct vdso_image *ve_get_vdso_64(struct ve_struct *ve)
>> return ve->vdso_64;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline struct ve_struct *override_ve(struct ve_struct *new_ve)
>> +{
>> + struct ve_struct *old_ve;
>> +
>> + guard(task_lock)(current);
>
> This adds a lock to hot paths such as ovl_permission, ovl_getattr and
> ovl_lookup; AI deems this worth stating, probably not that critical,
> but the save check result approach has no such problem.
Adding a separate field for overrides will solve this problem.
Nobody should race on it.
>
>> + old_ve = current->task_ve;
>> +
>> + current->task_ve = new_ve;
>> + return old_ve;
>> +}
>
> What about direction checks? ve0->veX ok and veX->ve0 is probably a
> security breach and should not be allowed.
I'll add a guard against it. If current is a CT process, it shouldn't be
able to override VE, only ve0 -> veX is OK.
>
--
Best regards, Riabchun Vladimir
Linux Kernel Developer, Virtuozzo
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 14:52 [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 0/4] Fix kernel crash in overlayfs Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-26 14:52 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 1/4] ve: Remove STOPPED state Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-28 11:58 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2026-10-26 14:52 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 2/4] ve: Introduce override_ve/revert_ve helpers Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-28 11:58 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2026-11-02 17:29 ` Vladimir Riabchun [this message]
2026-10-26 14:52 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 3/4] ovl: Keep creator VE in overlayfs superblock Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-26 14:52 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 4/4] ve/overlayfs: Override VE together with creds Vladimir Riabchun
2026-10-28 11:58 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2026-11-02 17:35 ` Vladimir Riabchun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f772e29-fae7-4cbc-bc0b-e339cd65050e@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox