From: "Eva Kurchatova (Virtuozzo)" <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
To: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v3] block: let container root set the block size of and flush its device
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 18:06:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc754a03-f706-470f-afa6-3b9656ebc236@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029-vstor-137668-block-let-container-root-set-the-block-size-v3-1-c3fd7db3777c@virtuozzo.com>
On 10/29/26 18:00, Konstantin Khorenko wrote:
> From: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
>
> BLKBSZSET and BLKFLSBUF check CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the initial user
> namespace, so root in a container cannot set the block size of a block
> device it has been given, nor flush its buffers, and mkfs.xfs on a loop
> device there stops with "cannot set blocksize 512 on block device
> /dev/loopN: Permission denied", or with "Flushing the data device
> failed, err=13" once it gets past the first.
>
> Check the capability relative to the container, as the other block
> code adapted for containers does, and let container root through only
> where its device cgroup grants write access to the device: a device
> handed to a container read-only may be held by a filesystem outside
> it, and neither its cache nor its block size should be touched from
> inside.
>
> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-137668
> Feature: ve: allow various syscalls in CT root userns
>
> Signed-off-by: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> Root in a container cannot run mkfs.xfs on a block device it has been
> given: BLKBSZSET and BLKFLSBUF want CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the initial user
> namespace. The patch checks the capability relative to the container
> and lets container root through only where its device cgroup grants
> write access to the device.
>
> v2 also refused BLKFLSBUF from a container with -EBUSY when a
> filesystem was mounted on the device. v3 drops that: the path is
> reachable only with a write grant on the device, and with that grant
> the container can already overwrite the filesystem under the mount, so
> forcing its writeback through fs_bdev_sync() is strictly less. The
> sync is what syncfs() does, bd_holder_lock is dropped before it, and
> invalidate_bdev() frees clean pages only. A container's own mounted
> loop device now behaves as on the host.
>
> CT disks handed out by vzctl are not affected: libvzctl grants them
> write access for mount only, which bdev_permission(BLK_OPEN_WRITE)
> does not satisfy, so they keep getting -EACCES as before.
>
> BLKROSET and BLKRASET stay under capable(): the former flips
> BD_READ_ONLY on a device the host may hold, the latter writes the
> per-disk bdi shared with the host and every partition. The neoltp CI
> carries strict XFAIL rules for the affected tests (PSBM-139222,
> PSBM-139077); the xfs ones start passing with this kernel and need a
> kernel-version condition, ioctl04 and ioctl06 keep failing.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Drop the -EBUSY refusal of BLKFLSBUF on a mounted device from a
> container, a device the container can write to is synced as on the
> host (Pavel Tikhomirov).
> - Add Pavel's Reviewed-by.
> - Link to v2: http://lore.virtuozzo.com/20261022022554.2427456-1-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Device in read-only cannot be flushed or have its block size changed
> from CT, depending on cgroup grant. Host path unchanged.
> - Device with mounted filesystem denies flush from a container with
> EBUSY. Container syncs its own mounts via the filesystem.
> - Host and container told apart by ve_is_super(), not by a failing
> capable().
> - Corrected the claims in the commit message.
> - Link to v1: http://lore.virtuozzo.com/20261021175410.2339797-1-eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com
>
> To: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
> To: Vladimir Riabchun <vladimir.riabchun@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> block/ioctl.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index a3c53b04e1e34..c49a35b01cb05 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/backing-dev.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/blktrace_api.h>
> +#include <linux/ve.h>
> #include <linux/pr.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> @@ -416,10 +417,20 @@ static int blkdev_pr_clear(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode,
> return ops->pr_clear(bdev, c.key);
> }
>
> +/* Container root administers only a device its device cgroup lets it write */
> +static bool blkdev_admin_capable(struct block_device *bdev)
> +{
> + if (!ve_capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return false;
> +
> + return ve_is_super(get_exec_env()) ||
> + !bdev_permission(bdev->bd_dev, BLK_OPEN_WRITE, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static int blkdev_flushbuf(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + if (!blkdev_admin_capable(bdev))
> return -EACCES;
>
> mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_holder_lock);
> @@ -527,11 +538,12 @@ static int blkdev_bszset(struct file *file, blk_mode_t mode,
> {
> // this one might be file_inode(file)->i_rdev - a rare valid
> // use of file_inode() for those.
> - dev_t dev = I_BDEV(file->f_mapping->host)->bd_dev;
> + struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(file->f_mapping->host);
> + dev_t dev = bdev->bd_dev;
> struct file *excl_file;
> int ret, n;
>
> - if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + if (!blkdev_admin_capable(bdev))
> return -EACCES;
> if (!argp)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ---
> base-commit: 0a88195dfe7ad750d8e0d9815e70515a03b270f1
> change-id: 20261029-vstor-137668-block-let-container-root-set-the-block-size-70922fd9b2a5
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Konstantin Khorenko,
> Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team
Acknowledged-by: Eva Kurchatova <eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 16:00 Konstantin Khorenko
2026-10-29 16:04 ` no-reply
2026-10-29 16:06 ` Eva Kurchatova (Virtuozzo) [this message]
2026-10-29 16:10 ` Konstantin Khorenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc754a03-f706-470f-afa6-3b9656ebc236@virtuozzo.com \
--to=eva.kurchatova@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox