From: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH v2 VZ10 1/2] ve/bpf: Limit number of BPF programs loadable per-VE
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 17:47:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ccc3cbc8-e225-41cf-b563-699254aeb57b@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f43be79-913a-4442-aa36-aa6059b02e4b@virtuozzo.com>
I thought we've decided in slack that having failcounts is enough,
so after "[PATCH VZ10 v7 7/9] ve: Introduce per-VE failcount" ads
bpf_prog_failcount, warning is not really needed to be aware about
lack of bpf programs.
On 8/26/26 18:48, Konstantin Khorenko wrote:
> a kind ping
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Konstantin Khorenko,
> Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team
>
> On 6/18/26 18:41, Konstantin Khorenko wrote:
>> i will apply the patch, but i would appreciate in case you add some WARN_ONCE
>> in case some CT hits the limit of available bpf programs.
>>
>> This will ease issue investigations + at some point might hints us that we need to increase the default, for example.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Konstantin Khorenko,
>> Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team
>>
>> On 5/29/26 16:42, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote:
>>> Without a per-VE cap a single container could exhaust the system-wide
>>> bpf JIT memory budget by loading excessive numbers of CGROUP_DEVICE
>>> programs via the VE_FEATURE_BPF path.
>>>
>>> Add bpf_prog_avail_nr / bpf_prog_max_nr counters to ve_struct and
>>> enforce them in bpf_prog_load() for non-bpf-capable callers loading
>>> CGROUP_DEVICE programs.
>>>
>>> Lifetime note: A BPF program loadded in VE takes a reference to ve, when
>>> container is stopped, all open fds to the BPF programm will be closed
>>> and when container manager removes container cgroups the BPF program
>>> will be released and thus releasing the reference to VE.
>>>
>>> Default max number note: It is somehow similar to ve.netif_max_nr, there
>>> each docker container creates two veths, and I also observe that docker
>>> container loads two bpf programs (one by dockerd, one by systemd). So
>>> let's use the same number.
>>>
>>> https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-131947
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
>>> Feature: ve: allow BPF in Containers
>>>
>>> --
>>> v2: Also put load_ve definition under CONFIG_VE.
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++++++
>>> include/linux/ve.h | 4 ++++
>>> kernel/bpf/core.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> kernel/ve/ve.c | 5 +++++
>>> 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
>>> index 80175c7a21c27..0212806d5efc2 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct cgroup;
>>> struct bpf_token;
>>> struct user_namespace;
>>> struct super_block;
>>> +struct ve_struct;
>>> struct inode;
>>>
>>> extern struct idr btf_idr;
>>> @@ -1522,6 +1523,13 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
>>> void *security;
>>> #endif
>>> struct bpf_token *token;
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VE
>>> + /* VE that loaded the program via VE_FEATURE_BPF path and against whose
>>> + * bpf_prog_avail_nr counter the program is accounted. NULL for programs
>>> + * loaded through the regular (non VE-restricted) path.
>>> + */
>>> + struct ve_struct *owner_ve;
>>> +#endif
>>> struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
>>> struct btf *btf;
>>> struct bpf_func_info *func_info;
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ve.h b/include/linux/ve.h
>>> index 224acf012821f..88b4d531c466e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/ve.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/ve.h
>>> @@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ struct ve_struct {
>>> atomic_t netif_avail_nr;
>>> int netif_max_nr;
>>>
>>> + atomic_t bpf_prog_avail_nr;
>>> + int bpf_prog_max_nr;
>>> +
>>> atomic64_t _uevent_seqnum;
>>>
>>> int _randomize_va_space;
>>> @@ -149,6 +152,7 @@ extern int nr_ve;
>>>
>>> #define NETNS_MAX_NR_DEFAULT 256 /* number of net-namespaces per-VE */
>>> #define NETIF_MAX_NR_DEFAULT 256 /* number of net-interfaces per-VE */
>>> +#define BPF_PROG_MAX_NR_DEFAULT 256 /* number of loaded BPF progs per-VE */
>>>
>>> extern unsigned int sysctl_ve_mount_nr;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
>>> index 4de8774458aca..7aaf73180fcdc 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
>>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h>
>>> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
>>> #include <linux/execmem.h>
>>> +#include <linux/ve.h>
>>>
>>> #include <asm/barrier.h>
>>> #include <linux/unaligned.h>
>>> @@ -2828,6 +2829,13 @@ void bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
>>> if (aux->dst_prog)
>>> bpf_prog_put(aux->dst_prog);
>>> bpf_token_put(aux->token);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VE
>>> + if (aux->owner_ve) {
>>> + atomic_inc(&aux->owner_ve->bpf_prog_avail_nr);
>>> + put_ve(aux->owner_ve);
>>> + aux->owner_ve = NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>> INIT_WORK(&aux->work, bpf_prog_free_deferred);
>>> schedule_work(&aux->work);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>>> index 0475a72c93c06..481ae62429097 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
>>> @@ -2663,6 +2663,9 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
>>> struct bpf_prog *prog, *dst_prog = NULL;
>>> struct btf *attach_btf = NULL;
>>> struct bpf_token *token = NULL;
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VE
>>> + struct ve_struct *load_ve = NULL;
>>> +#endif
>>> bool bpf_cap;
>>> int err;
>>> char license[128];
>>> @@ -2744,6 +2747,22 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
>>> if (is_perfmon_prog_type(type) && !bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_PERFMON))
>>> goto put_token;
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VE
>>> + /* Restrict the number of BPF programs that can be loaded via the
>>> + * VE-allowed path. Without this, a single container could exhaust
>>> + * the system-wide bpf JIT memory budget by loading excessive
>>> + * numbers of CGROUP_DEVICE programs.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!bpf_cap && type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE) {
>>> + load_ve = get_exec_env();
>>> + if (atomic_dec_if_positive(&load_ve->bpf_prog_avail_nr) < 0) {
>>> + load_ve = NULL;
>>> + err = -ENOSPC;
>>> + goto put_token;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> /* attach_prog_fd/attach_btf_obj_fd can specify fd of either bpf_prog
>>> * or btf, we need to check which one it is
>>> */
>>> @@ -2809,6 +2828,16 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
>>> prog->aux->dev_bound = !!attr->prog_ifindex;
>>> prog->aux->xdp_has_frags = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS;
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VE
>>> + /* Hand the avail_nr slot reservation over to the prog. bpf_prog_free()
>>> + * will release it via put_ve + counter increment.
>>> + */
>>> + if (load_ve) {
>>> + prog->aux->owner_ve = get_ve(load_ve);
>>> + load_ve = NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> /* move token into prog->aux, reuse taken refcnt */
>>> prog->aux->token = token;
>>> token = NULL;
>>> @@ -2932,6 +2961,14 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
>>> btf_put(prog->aux->attach_btf);
>>> bpf_prog_free(prog);
>>> put_token:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VE
>>> + /* The load_ve is non-NULL only if we decremented bpf_prog_avail_nr
>>> + * but did not hand the reservation off to the prog yet (i.e. failure
>>> + * happened before bpf_prog_alloc()). Roll back the counter.
>>> + */
>>> + if (load_ve)
>>> + atomic_inc(&load_ve->bpf_prog_avail_nr);
>>> +#endif
>>> bpf_token_put(token);
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/kernel/ve/ve.c b/kernel/ve/ve.c
>>> index 198c82f010cc1..48da546117bb7 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/ve/ve.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/ve/ve.c
>>> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ struct ve_struct ve0 = {
>>> .netns_max_nr = INT_MAX,
>>> .netif_avail_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MAX),
>>> .netif_max_nr = INT_MAX,
>>> + .bpf_prog_avail_nr = ATOMIC_INIT(INT_MAX),
>>> + .bpf_prog_max_nr = INT_MAX,
>>> .fsync_enable = FSYNC_FILTERED,
>>> ._randomize_va_space =
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK
>>> @@ -983,6 +985,9 @@ static struct cgroup_subsys_state *ve_create(struct cgroup_subsys_state *parent_
>>> atomic_set(&ve->netif_avail_nr, NETIF_MAX_NR_DEFAULT);
>>> ve->netif_max_nr = NETIF_MAX_NR_DEFAULT;
>>>
>>> + atomic_set(&ve->bpf_prog_avail_nr, BPF_PROG_MAX_NR_DEFAULT);
>>> + ve->bpf_prog_max_nr = BPF_PROG_MAX_NR_DEFAULT;
>>> +
>>> err = ve_log_init(ve);
>>> if (err)
>>> goto err_log;
>>
>
--
Best regards, Pavel Tikhomirov
Senior Software Developer, Virtuozzo.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260529144215.939517-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
[not found] ` <20260529144215.939517-2-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
[not found] ` <3ca2d5c2-3d7e-4694-ab65-d8b3fa8b6844@virtuozzo.com>
2026-08-26 16:48 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-08-28 15:47 ` Pavel Tikhomirov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ccc3cbc8-e225-41cf-b563-699254aeb57b@virtuozzo.com \
--to=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox