From: Liu Kui <kui.liu@virtuozzo.com>
To: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: azaitsev@virtuozzo.com, devel@openvz.org,
Liu Kui <kui.liu@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1] fs/fuse kio: start connect once per rpc_queue_work batch
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 19:28:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921-acssp872-batch-connect-v1-1-ded37d934f28@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
pcs_rpc_connect() is synchronous: it performs a full connect+auth
cycle while holding ep->mutex. rpc_queue_work() splices the entire
ep->input_queue onto an on-stack list and used to trigger the connect
from pcs_rpc_send() on the first staged message. When the connect
fails, pcs_rpc_reset() purges ep->input_queue and ep->state_queue,
but the messages still sitting on the on-stack list are invisible to
the purge - each of them re-triggers another blocking connect attempt
under the same mutex hold. With a large backlog and an unreachable
peer this keeps ep->mutex held for O(messages * connect timeout):
in one crashdump the rescuer of pcs_wq ground through such a batch
for days, starving calendar_work/rpc_close_work on the same ep and
wedging umount in flush_workqueue(pcs_wq).
Stage all messages from the batch on ep->state_queue first and start
the connect once afterwards. A failed connect now aborts the whole
batch in a single rpc_abort(), bounding the mutex hold to one connect
attempt. This also restores the meaning of state_queue, which
otherwise never held more than one message.
https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-135626
Signed-off-by: Liu Kui <kui.liu@virtuozzo.com>
---
Fix a pathological case seen in ACSSP-872 (and ASUP-3562) crashdumps:
a single rpc_queue_work() invocation could hold ep->mutex for days,
re-running a blocking connect+auth once per queued message to an
unreachable peer, wedging the pcs_wq rescuer, calendar/close works
and umount in flush_workqueue().
https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/ACSSP-872
---
fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rpc.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rpc.c b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rpc.c
index 540225006726..c50e31c08a31 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rpc.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/kio/pcs/pcs_rpc.c
@@ -702,9 +702,6 @@ static void pcs_rpc_send(struct pcs_rpc * ep, struct pcs_msg * msg, bool requeue
list_add_tail(&msg->list, &ep->state_queue);
msg->stage = PCS_MSG_STAGE_UNSENT;
-
- if (ep->state == PCS_RPC_UNCONN)
- pcs_rpc_connect(ep);
}
void pcs_rpc_kick_queue(struct pcs_rpc * ep)
@@ -930,6 +927,21 @@ static void rpc_queue_work(struct work_struct *w)
list_del_init(&msg->list);
pcs_rpc_send(ep, msg, 0);
}
+
+ /* pcs_rpc_connect() is synchronous: it can block for a full
+ * connect+auth cycle while holding ep->mutex. Start it once, after
+ * every message from input_q has been staged on ep->state_queue,
+ * instead of from pcs_rpc_send() on the first message. This way a
+ * failed connect aborts the whole batch at once: rpc_abort() purges
+ * ep->state_queue, whereas messages still sitting on the on-stack
+ * input_q are invisible to the purge and would each trigger another
+ * blocking connect attempt under the same mutex hold. It also
+ * restores the meaning of state_queue, which otherwise never holds
+ * more than one message.
+ */
+ if (ep->state == PCS_RPC_UNCONN && !list_empty(&ep->state_queue))
+ pcs_rpc_connect(ep);
+
list_splice_tail_init(&ep->state_queue, &state_q);
while (!list_empty(&state_q)) {
struct pcs_msg * msg = list_first_entry(&state_q, struct pcs_msg, list);
---
base-commit: 3851feefb321d7dee9e57cbe7926410aa6dd043f
change-id: 20260921-acssp872-batch-connect-bec05e9db04d
Best regards,
--
Liu Kui <kui.liu@virtuozzo.com>
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 11:28 Liu Kui [this message]
2026-09-21 12:13 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-21 20:52 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-21 21:17 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-22 9:38 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-22 10:46 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-22 11:36 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-22 13:12 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-22 14:10 ` Vladimir Riabchun
2026-09-22 15:01 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2026-09-22 15:19 ` Vladimir Riabchun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921-acssp872-batch-connect-v1-1-ded37d934f28@virtuozzo.com \
--to=kui.liu@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=azaitsev@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox