From: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>, andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 0/4] dm-ploop: fix acknowledged writes lost when discard and allocation share a BAT writeback
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 11:42:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3c3f09b-9988-48ab-b94b-48ba50d79bd1@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028143647.2972030-1-den@openvz.org>
committing without review
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Khorenko,
Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team
On 10/28/26 15:36, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The hci-ploop fstrim test caught dm-ploop losing an acknowledged write
> (VSTOR-151979). Since "dm-ploop: fix and rework md updates", an
> allocation and a discard on the same BAT page can share one pending
> index writeback, and its completion applies the written page by the
> writeback's type only. A first write that rides in a DISCARD writeback
> is on disk but never reaches the local BAT: it reads back as zeroes,
> the next write allocates the cluster again and the data is gone. A
> discard that rides in an ALLOC writeback leaves the local BAT mapped
> while disk has zero, so writes after it are lost on the next open.
> fstrim or guest TRIM racing ordinary writes is enough.
>
> Patch 4 is the fix: the completion applies the changes of the pios
> attached to the writeback, and of the relocation done on grow, instead
> of filtering the page by type. Patches 1 and 2 fix older bugs on the
> same path that the old completion partly hid: a failed BAT writeback
> freed the wrong clusters, and the online merge of the latest snapshot
> left BAT levels above the top one. Patch 3 drops the dead PLOOP_DELAYWB
> code.
>
> Tested on dev-cl04, 6.12.0-211.52.1.22.9.vz10 with the module built
> out of tree:
> - a reproducer racing cluster discards with first writes on one BAT
> page, 512 clusters a round: without the series 3 of 15360 first
> writes read back as zeroes right after the write returned and stayed
> lost after remount; with a 200 us sleep before bat_lock in the
> allocation path 1801 of 2560; the reverse order, a sleep in the
> discard path, left data written after a discard unmapped on disk.
> With the series nothing is lost in either order;
> - the ploop pytest suite, ploop and qcow2 formats, passes;
> - nothing exercises a failing BAT writeback, that path is checked by
> reading only.
>
> Changes in v2, after Andrey's review:
> - 2/4: also clear the deltas[] slot the top delta moved out of, as
> notify_delta_merged() does. The md_lock in the renumbering stays: it
> is per page, and notify_delta_merged() takes it the same way;
> - 3/4: new, drops every PLOOP_DELAYWB block instead of only the one in
> the completion;
> - 4/4: the PLOOP_DELAYWB removal moved to 3/4, otherwise unchanged;
> - Reviewed-by added to 1/4, 2/4 and 4/4.
> The ploop pytest suite and the reproducer were rerun on v2.
>
> v1: http://lore.virtuozzo.com/kernel/20261027163300.2166639-1-den@openvz.org/
>
> Denis V. Lunev (4):
> dm-ploop: fix freeing the wrong clusters when a BAT writeback fails
> dm-ploop: renumber BAT levels when the latest snapshot is merged
> dm-ploop: drop the dead PLOOP_DELAYWB code
> dm-ploop: fix lost BAT updates when alloc and discard share a
> writeback
>
> drivers/md/dm-ploop-cmd.c | 25 +++++-
> drivers/md/dm-ploop-map.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
> drivers/md/dm-ploop.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: b499efa17aa9fb8f20512d1831d1cb61b22e60d3
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 14:36 Denis V. Lunev
2026-10-28 14:36 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 1/4] dm-ploop: fix freeing the wrong clusters when a BAT writeback fails Denis V. Lunev
2026-10-28 15:00 ` no-reply
2026-10-28 14:36 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 2/4] dm-ploop: renumber BAT levels when the latest snapshot is merged Denis V. Lunev
2026-10-28 15:00 ` no-reply
2026-10-28 14:36 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 3/4] dm-ploop: drop the dead PLOOP_DELAYWB code Denis V. Lunev
2026-10-28 15:00 ` no-reply
2026-10-28 14:36 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 4/4] dm-ploop: fix lost BAT updates when alloc and discard share a writeback Denis V. Lunev
2026-10-28 15:06 ` no-reply
2026-10-28 15:16 ` [Devel] [PATCH hci-8.1 v2 0/4] dm-ploop: fix acknowledged writes lost when discard and allocation share a BAT writeback Andrey Zhadchenko
2026-11-02 10:42 ` Konstantin Khorenko [this message]
2026-11-02 10:44 ` Konstantin Khorenko
2026-11-02 15:32 ` Konstantin Khorenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3c3f09b-9988-48ab-b94b-48ba50d79bd1@virtuozzo.com \
--to=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox