* [Devel] [PATCH vz10 v2] fuse: reject FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES for non-regular inodes [not found] <20260706110002.1024515-3-khorenko@virtuozzo.com> @ 2026-08-19 16:05 ` Konstantin Khorenko 2026-08-26 16:49 ` Konstantin Khorenko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Khorenko @ 2026-08-19 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES invalidates the read/write io state of an inode, which only regular files have. The notification carries a nodeid, and the actual work is deferred to a workqueue: fuse_dev_do_write() fuse_notify() fuse_notify_inval_files() fuse_invalidate_files() inode = fuse_ilookup(fc, nodeid) queue_delayed_work(fuse_inval_files_wq, &fc->inval_files_work) ... fuse_inval_files_work() worker context wake_up(&fi->page_waitq) regular file state What the bytes behind fi->page_waitq are depends on the inode type, see fuse_init_inode(): S_ISREG fuse_init_file_inode() init_waitqueue_head(&fi->page_waitq) S_ISDIR fuse_init_dir() the same union holds fi->rdc, the readdir cache (rdc.lock, rdc.version, rdc.mtime, ...) other - nothing, fuse_alloc_inode() leaves the union as allocated So for a nodeid which is not a regular file - the mount root, say - the worker calls wake_up() on storage that is not a waitqueue and walks whatever lies there as a waitqueue list: a GPF in the worker, or a lockup on a bogus lock, depending on what the overlapping fields happen to hold. vstorage never sends the notification for anything but a regular file, but nothing in the protocol or in the kernel makes that a rule: the message carries a bare nodeid, and every nodeid the server has handed out is a candidate, FUSE_ROOT_ID included - the mount root is always a directory and always in the inode cache. That is how it was found: a selftest driving /dev/fuse by hand picked FUSE_ROOT_ID as the one nodeid guaranteed to exist without a preceding LOOKUP, and the notification for it crashed the kernel. A fuse server can be started by an unprivileged user, so this is reachable without any privileges. Fixes: eab013c7511c ("fuse: skip waiting for fuse writeback") Feature: vStorage https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-137234 Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com> --- v1 -> v2: - reject the notification in fuse_invalidate_files() instead of merely skipping the wake_up() in fuse_inval_files_work(): a non-regular inode is not a valid target for FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES at all, so fail it with -EOPNOTSUPP (dropping the reference taken by fuse_ilookup()) - shrink the code comment down to why fi->page_waitq must not be touched for non-regular inodes, the struct fuse_inode layout details are implementation specific and moved to the commit message - reword the commit message: spell out the call path, which inode type initialises what, and how a non-regular nodeid reaches the worker fs/fuse/inode.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index ea158367a1efd..3ca447cb3b6eb 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -667,6 +667,16 @@ int fuse_invalidate_files(struct fuse_dev *fud, u64 nodeid) if (!inode) return -ENOENT; + /* + * fuse_inval_files_work() wakes fi->page_waitq, which is initialised + * for regular files only - for other inode types it is not a + * waitqueue at all. + */ + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) { + iput(inode); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); /* -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Devel] [PATCH vz10 v2] fuse: reject FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES for non-regular inodes 2026-08-19 16:05 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 v2] fuse: reject FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES for non-regular inodes Konstantin Khorenko @ 2026-08-26 16:49 ` Konstantin Khorenko 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Khorenko @ 2026-08-26 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Liu Kui, Alexey Kuznetsov, Pavel Tikhomirov; +Cc: OpenVZ devel list a kind ping -- Best regards, Konstantin Khorenko, Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team On 8/19/26 18:05, Konstantin Khorenko wrote: > FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES invalidates the read/write io state of an inode, > which only regular files have. The notification carries a nodeid, and > the actual work is deferred to a workqueue: > > fuse_dev_do_write() > fuse_notify() > fuse_notify_inval_files() > fuse_invalidate_files() inode = fuse_ilookup(fc, nodeid) > queue_delayed_work(fuse_inval_files_wq, &fc->inval_files_work) > ... > fuse_inval_files_work() worker context > wake_up(&fi->page_waitq) regular file state > > What the bytes behind fi->page_waitq are depends on the inode type, see > fuse_init_inode(): > > S_ISREG fuse_init_file_inode() init_waitqueue_head(&fi->page_waitq) > S_ISDIR fuse_init_dir() the same union holds fi->rdc, the > readdir cache (rdc.lock, rdc.version, > rdc.mtime, ...) > other - nothing, fuse_alloc_inode() leaves > the union as allocated > > So for a nodeid which is not a regular file - the mount root, say - the > worker calls wake_up() on storage that is not a waitqueue and walks > whatever lies there as a waitqueue list: a GPF in the worker, or a lockup > on a bogus lock, depending on what the overlapping fields happen to hold. > > vstorage never sends the notification for anything but a regular file, > but nothing in the protocol or in the kernel makes that a rule: the > message carries a bare nodeid, and every nodeid the server has handed > out is a candidate, FUSE_ROOT_ID included - the mount root is always a > directory and always in the inode cache. That is how it was found: a > selftest driving /dev/fuse by hand picked FUSE_ROOT_ID as the one nodeid > guaranteed to exist without a preceding LOOKUP, and the notification for > it crashed the kernel. A fuse server can be started by an unprivileged > user, so this is reachable without any privileges. > > Fixes: eab013c7511c ("fuse: skip waiting for fuse writeback") > Feature: vStorage > https://virtuozzo.atlassian.net/browse/VSTOR-137234 > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com> > --- > v1 -> v2: > - reject the notification in fuse_invalidate_files() instead of merely > skipping the wake_up() in fuse_inval_files_work(): a non-regular inode > is not a valid target for FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES at all, so fail it > with -EOPNOTSUPP (dropping the reference taken by fuse_ilookup()) > - shrink the code comment down to why fi->page_waitq must not be touched > for non-regular inodes, the struct fuse_inode layout details are > implementation specific and moved to the commit message > - reword the commit message: spell out the call path, which inode type > initialises what, and how a non-regular nodeid reaches the worker > > fs/fuse/inode.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c > index ea158367a1efd..3ca447cb3b6eb 100644 > --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c > +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c > @@ -667,6 +667,16 @@ int fuse_invalidate_files(struct fuse_dev *fud, u64 nodeid) > if (!inode) > return -ENOENT; > > + /* > + * fuse_inval_files_work() wakes fi->page_waitq, which is initialised > + * for regular files only - for other inode types it is not a > + * waitqueue at all. > + */ > + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) { > + iput(inode); > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + > fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); > > /* _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-26 16:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260706110002.1024515-3-khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
2026-08-19 16:05 ` [Devel] [PATCH vz10 v2] fuse: reject FUSE_NOTIFY_INVAL_FILES for non-regular inodes Konstantin Khorenko
2026-08-26 16:49 ` Konstantin Khorenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox